INTERPRETATION OF THE CONCEPTS OF LACUNA UNITS IN MODERN LINGUISTICS
Ключевые слова:
Annotation. The article is devoted to the description of the concept of lacunae, which is a common problem of language and culture. It provides insights into the emergence, study, and linguistic significance of the concept of lakuna. In particular, the study of the concept of lacuna in Uzbek linguistics and the achievements and shortcomings in this area are analyzed. The article pays special attention to the specificity of the concept of lacuna, its description. It is clarified that this phenomenon differs from related events, in particular, from realities. In the current period, linguistics has critically analyzed the cases related to the mixing of these two phenomena.Аннотация
Annotation. The article is devoted to the description of the concept of
lacunae, which is a common problem of language and culture. It provides insights
into the emergence, study, and linguistic significance of the concept of lakuna. In
particular, the study of the concept of lacuna in Uzbek linguistics and the
achievements and shortcomings in this area are analyzed.
The article pays special attention to the specificity of the concept of lacuna, its
description. It is clarified that this phenomenon differs from related events, in
particular, from realities. In the current period, linguistics has critically analyzed the
cases related to the mixing of these two phenomena.
Библиографические ссылки
REFERENCES
Khasanov A. 2020. “The linguocultural significance of euphemisms as a
speech lacunae”. Лисоний маданиятни шакллантириш: тажриба, муаммо ва
ечимлар” мавзусидаги илмий-амалий анжуман материаллари, 100-105.
Шаҳрисабз: TDPU nashriyoti.
Khasanov A. 2021. “ENRICHMENT OF UZBEK LEXIC RESERVE
WITH KYPCHAK DIALECT”. ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ И
ИХ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ В ПРАКТИКЕ ПРЕПОДАВАНИЯ РУССКОГО И
ИНОСТРАННЫХ ЯЗЫКОВ, 84-89.
Majidovich K. 2021. “Features of Dialectal Words That Fill in the
Gaps in the Language Vocabulary”. International Journal on Integrated Education
(10): 157-164.
Majidovich K. 2021. “Filling Lexical Gaps In The Uzbek Language With
Dialectisms (Based On The Turkic-Kaltatoy Dialect)”. International Journals of
Sciences and High Technologies 25: 01-07.
Majidovich K. 2021. “Possibilities of Kipchak Dialects in filling the
Lexicon of Uzbek”. International Journal on Integrated Education 4: 287-294.
Navoiy A. 2012. Muhokamat ul-lug‘atayn. To‘la asarlar to‘plami, 515-
Tashkent: G‘afur G‘ulom nomidagi nashriyot-matbaa ijodiy uyi.
Rakhimjonovich T. 2020. “THE STUDY OF NATIONAL-CULTURAL
UNITS IN UZBEK AND WORLD LINGUISTICS”. ANGLISTICUM. Journal of
the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies 9(6): 68-76.
Tojiboev B. 2021. LISONIC AND NOLISONIC FACTORS OF
NATIONAL-CULTURAL ASSOCIATIONS. Scientific Bulletin of Namangan State
University 2 (2): 215-220.
Umurzakova M. 2020. “THE SEMANTIC-STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION OF SEGMENTED CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE UZBEK
LANGUAGE AND THE PROBLEMS OF THEIR STUDY”. Theoretical &
Applied Science 5: 685-688.
Vinay J. Darbelnet J. 1958. Stylistique comparee du fraicais et de I’anglais.
Paris: 1958.
Xolmanova Z., Saidahmedova O., Nurillayeva O. 2018.
Lingvokulturologiyaga oid tushunchalar tadqiqi. Toshkent: Navro‘z.
Xolmanova Z. 2021. “Alisher Navoiyning zamonaviy tilshunoslik
taraqqiyotidagi o‘rni”. Alisher Navoiy 1: 9-18.
Быкова Г. 2003. Лакунарность как категория лексической
системологии. Благовещенск: Изд-во БГПУ.
Гак В. 1977. Сравнительная типология французского и русского
языков. Ленинград: Просвещение, 1977.
Коллектив. 1983-1985. Алишер Навоий асарлари тилининг изоҳли
луғати (Э. Фозилов таҳрири остида). Тошкент: Фан.
Исматуллаева Н. 2021. Хитой ва ӯзбек тилларида лакуналарнинг
воқеланиши: Фил.ф.б.ф.д (PhD) дисс. Тошкент: ТДШУ.
Мусаева Ф. 2021. Ӯзбек шеваларининг лингвомаданий тадқиқи.
Тошкент: Фан.
Неъматова Г. 1996. “Ӯсимлик номларининг маъновий қиймати”.
Ӯзбек тили ва адабиёти 6: 22-25.
