THE PORTRAYAL OF WOMEN IN CHARLOTTE BRONTË'S "JANE EYRE" AND JANE AUSTEN'S "PRIDE AND PREJUDICE"
Sevara Usmonova Sultanovna
Tojidinova Diyora
Keywords: Keywords: nineteenth-century feminism, women, marriage, Jane Austen, Charlotte Brontë.
Abstract
Abstract
Multiple marriage proposals in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice and Charlotte
Brontë's Jane Eyre are the focus of this article. I'll demonstrate how the narrative
structures of Austen's and Brontë's works are fundamentally shaped by the inclusion
of two proposals, one from Darcy and the other from Rochester. In order to illustrate
when a proposal should be accepted, I will look at how Austen and Brontë present their
heroines with multiple proposals. Through discussions with a number of literary
experts who study Austen and Brontë, this thesis will place Elizabeth Bennet and Jane
Eyre's decisions in context. The first chapter will analyze Darcy and Elizabeth's
evolving relationship and discuss Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. The second
chapter will look at Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë and how her personal journey
connects to her relationship with Rochester. I'll also look at how each author illustrates
how gender norms and stereotypes can be detrimental to both one's personal growth
and the stability of a relationship.
References
References:
Austen, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Broadview Press. 2002.
Austen, Jane. Emma. Premier Classics. 2006.
Austen, Jane. Mansfield Park. Premier Classics. 2006. Awaliah, Indah Miftah.
“Gender Issues in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre.” Eternal (English, Teaching,
Learning & Research Journal), vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, pp. 107-117.
Bander, Elaine. “Neither Sex, Money, nor Power: Why Elizabeth Finally Says
Yes!” Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal, vol. 34, 2012, pp. 25-41.
Bell, Millicent. “Jane Eyre: The Tale of the Governess.” The American Scholar,
vol. 65, no. 2, 1996, pp.263-69.
Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. Broadview Press. 1999. Fanning, Sarah. “'A soul
worth saving': post-feminist masculinities in twenty-first-century televised
adaptations of Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights.” Adaptation, vol. 10, no. 1, 2017,
pp. 73-92.
Gao, Haiyan. “Jane Austen’s Ideal Man in Pride and Prejudice.” Theory and
Practice in Language Studies, vol.3, no.2, 2013, pp.384-389.
Gao, Haiyan. “Reflection on Feminism in Jane Eyre.” Theory and Practice in
Language Studies, vol. 3, no. 6, 2013, pp. 926-931.
Mishou, Aubrey L. “Surviving Thornfield: Jane Eyre and Nineteenth-Century
Evolutionary Theory.” Renascence: essays on values in literature, vol. 66, no. 4,
, pp.255-272.
Moe, Melina. “Multiple Modernities in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.” ELH,
vol. 81, no. 4, 2016, pp. 1075-1103.
Jackson, M.W. “Rousseau’s Discourse on Heroes and Heroism.” Proceedings of the
American Philosophical Society, vol. 133, no. 3, 1989, pp.434-446.
Kruger, Daniel., et al. “Pride and Prejudice or Family and Flirtation?: Jane Austen’s
Depiction of Women’s Mating Strategies.” Philosophy and Literature, vol. 38, no.
A, 2014, pp. A114-A128 7